New: figures written in the text are now cross-checked against the statements automatically.How it works
Why DealBasis

Know before you sign the LOI

The time and cost of finding out by hand, and what happens to deals when diligence finds problems late.

The workBy handWith DealBasis
Time to know if the numbers hold up4 to 6 weeks for a buy-side quality of earnings report2Seconds. Every document is read and checked as soon as you upload it
Cost of that first answer$25,000 to $50,000 for a buy-side quality of earnings on a $5M to $15M company2A DealBasis subscription. Pricing on request
Reading the documentsRetyping figures from PDFs into a spreadsheetFigures read from every page, table and sentence
Testing add-backsJudgment calls that vary by analystThe same rules on every deal, with the reason shown
Checking the numbersSpot checks when there's timeEvery figure cross-checked against the statements and ledger
Finding the sourceSearching the PDF for where a number came fromOne click to the page, row or cell
Committee materialsBuilding the memo and deck from scratchDrafted from the record, ready to download
Why deals die

Most broken deals fail on what diligence finds

Axial, a deal platform for the lower middle market, studied 75 deals sourced through it that broke after a signed LOI in 2025. Nearly half died on diligence findings, often after months of exclusivity.1

46.6%

of broken deals died on diligence findings: quality of earnings or otherwise1

2x

Deals killed by QoE EBITDA discrepancies rose from 10.6% in 2023 to 21.3% in 20251

106 days

Average time a private equity buyer spent in exclusivity before the deal broke1

$338M

Broken-deal expenses at one large private equity firm, KKR, over six years4

$25,000 to $50,000

The quality of earnings fee alone, on a $5M to $15M company

That is the typical buy-side QoE fee2, and it is paid whether or not the deal closes, though some QoE firms discount it when a deal dies3. On top of it come legal fees (a median of $28,500 on closed searcher acquisitions3), travel, lender deposits and the deal team's months in exclusivity.

Why 2025's broken LOIs failed

Share of 75 broken deals, Axial Dead Deal Report1

Diligence findings, other than QoE25.3%
QoE EBITDA discrepancies21.3%
Renegotiation14.7%
Seller decisions13.3%
Financing constraints10.7%
Business underperformance8.0%

QoE EBITDA discrepancies

DealBasis tests management's EBITDA bridge before you sign. On Project Saguaro it found $592,000 of Adjusted EBITDA the documents don't support, $3.55M of enterprise value at 6.0x.

Other diligence findings

Unrecorded debt, revenue reversed after period end, receivables outpacing sales and entries just under approval limits surface in the first pass, not week five.

Renegotiation

Bid on the EBITDA the evidence supports from the start, so there is less to re-trade after diligence.

Months lost in exclusivity

Know which deals to walk away from before you sign an LOI and start the clock.

Sources
  1. Axial, Dead Deal Report: Unpacking 2025's Broken LOIs, January 2026. Figures cover 75 deals sourced on Axial that broke after a signed LOI; 46.6% is its two diligence categories added together.
  2. BD Emerson, How Much Does a Quality of Earnings Report Cost?, July 2026. Buy-side fees by enterprise value; four to six weeks for a buy-side report.
  3. Big Deal Small Business, Results of Deal Cost Survey, July 2021. Median legal spend across 15 searcher acquisitions; some respondents reported dead-deal discounts on QoE fees.
  4. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC Charges KKR With Misallocating Broken Deal Expenses, June 2015. $338 million over six years ending 2011.